I told you that in order to live in a society where the rule of law is established, you must live in cooperation with others, observing a set lifestyle and discipline. To ensure your safety, he advised that there are considerable legal sanctions against your misconduct and that domestic violence is unacceptable for any reason. The Special Act on Prostitution emphasized that acts that harm a spouse can never be justified and that such acts could have irreversible consequences. He also said that it is more important to take responsibility for your actions than to try to hide the truth when you commit an error. The Special Act on Prostitution emphasized that infidelity must never occur under any circumstances, and added that the help of experts is urgently needed. He said that we should keep in mind that trying to distort the facts about what has already happened can make it more difficult to resolve the case. The incident at a cafe began with a meeting between lawyer F and doctor Z. Z lent a large amount of money to F in the name of his business investment, but he did not get the money back within the promised time limit. Z urged F several times, but he rather criticized Z’s investment method and made insulting remarks. Mr. Z claimed that he received hospital treatment due to extreme stress and even considered extreme options. Eventually, Mr. Z sued Mr. F with historical records, and Mr. F regretted his actions and expressed his apology. Mr. Z tried to overcome the difficulties through family support and counseling treatment. A police investigation began with an acquaintance’s report, and controversy arose when the investigator in charge was found to be close to Mr. Z’s relatives. Mr. F made an attempt to cover up the case, asking for the removal of evidence during the investigation. The Special Act on Sex Trafficking emphasized the mental pain that Mr. Z would have suffered during the investigation, and submitted data containing the circumstances in which Mr. F attempted to destroy evidence as evidence. It was difficult to reveal the truth of the case in the absence of witnesses or CCTV footage, but Mr. Z collected evidence such as message records and financial transaction details exchanged with Mr. F and submitted it to the investigative agency. The Special Act on Sex Trafficking filed a lawsuit for compensation for mental damage and was ruled in favor, and the case was concluded with Mr. Z’s victory. I will list the things I concluded with the help of the Special Act on Sex Trafficking.Actor F and police officer I claimed that they usually had a lot of disagreements and that they had a bad relationship. He said that the crime was an incident in which an officer accused the actor. Officer I accused the other of having a bad relationship. To explain this, he claimed that he had secured a lot of factual data based on facts and repeatedly corrected his unfavorable remarks, dealt with articles wishing for mercy from his colleagues, and mentioned his innocence. The incident took place inside the department store, and the testimony of the police officer and the actor who emphasized the witness was consistent, so it was difficult. He said that it was difficult to apply for evidence and get positive results, and that the Special Act on Prostitution and the receipt of evidence were necessary to resolve doubts. If you were caught up in a complicated case to deal with, it would be necessary to hire a professional assistant with numerous experiences and strategies in defense. If found guilty, you could face a number of additional legal sanctions, including fines, probation, and orders for community service. He has identified confrontations and infighting between colleagues and mentioned that there are hostile interests, but there have been no situations in which physical force has been exercised. In addition, he claimed that the accusation continued on the grounds of bad feelings between Mr. I and Mr. F, claiming that realistic innocence was possible.He stressed that he should exercise his right to refuse statements against him and keep in mind his right to seek assistance from his lawyers. He said that the spouse should not disclose or share personal information outside without the consent of the other party and should respect and protect the privacy of the other party. He stressed that the wind is unacceptable for any reason.